Google
Maps is a patient teacher. She knows
where I’m going and continually reminds me when I get off track. When I miss a turn or make a mistake, she
doesn’t get upset or give up on me.
Instead, she recalculates and tells me exactly what to do and where to
go to keep moving in the right direction.
In fact, I find myself being much less patient with my GPS than she is
with me.
John
Hattie and Gregory Yates argue that educators could use a GPS as a model for
providing feedback to students. Before
exploring the GPS analogy further, take a look at the somewhat disturbing findings
about feedback in the classroom. Hattie
and Yates came to these conclusions through a series of extensive interviews
and classroom observations conducted by trained observers:
- Teachers routinely say they give lots of helpful feedback to students.
- Trained classroom observers see very little teacher-to-student feedback, even in classrooms with expert teachers.
- Most students report getting very little feedback from their teachers, often only a few seconds of feedback a day.
The
irony is that good academic feedback is essential for learning and can have a
huge positive impact. For example, Robert
Marzano documents the extensive research about academic feedback and includes
“setting objectives and providing feedback” as one his high probability teaching strategies in his still impressive
book, Classroom Instruction that Works. Feedback, when used well, can double the
rate of learning and is among the top ten influences on achievement. The question isn’t whether or not feedback is
helpful. Rather, it is this: What does
“effective feedback” look like and sound like in the classroom?
Hattie
and Yates say this about using the GPS as a model for giving feedback:
[The
GPS] can only look forward. It remains
unconcerned about any past streets, suburbs, or erstwhile errors passed through
on route. We may get to a location
through using different roads and we may take longer or shorter to get
there. But such differences are
superficial since options are constrained severely by reality. At some point, all routes to one goal will
converge, even though the starting points vary.
If
we know where we want the student to go, and we know where he or she is now, feedback
is the communication about the next step or next turn. It is not praise, it is not generalizations,
and if the researchers are right, it must be more than whole-group feedback. If students are all over the map, to get them
all to the same destination takes specific
individual teacher-to-student feedback.
Consider
this scenario: You are one of 30 drivers spread out all over Hamilton County but
all heading to the same destination. You
all are using the same GPS and it is trying to guide you all at the same time. As one of the drivers, you might be able to
get some help from this GPS giving whole-group directions to all 30 drivers,
but most of the specific turns would not be useful until all of you are very close
to the same point on the map.
How
much attention would you pay to whole-group feedback from this GPS? If your answer is “not much,” it might be
worthwhile also thinking about ways to increase the individual feedback you
give to students as they move toward a common goal.
Below
is another roadmap for effective feedback from Edutopia. Similar to the
other experts, this model argues for specific, individual, and actionable
steps. Start at 1 and work through 5. It is another map that will take you home.
I
hope your week “turns” out to be a good one, HSE.
Phil
No comments:
Post a Comment