The Teacher
Effectiveness Rubric is attempting an incredibly difficult task. Think about trying to list all the factors
that go into “good teaching.” Any list
you might start would soon get lengthy, and the various items on the list are
likely to overlap and influence each other.
You can see this happen with just a quick run-through of rubric we are
using.
One way to
look at what the TER is trying to do is to think about the dichotomy of good
teaching: Teaching is both an art and a
science.
The Science
The science
of teaching is about being intentional and reflective. Educational research is clear that not all
instructional strategies are equal when it comes to student learning. There are what Robert Marzano calls
“high-yield” strategies, and others equally respected in the field talk about
“best practices.” The Teacher
Effectiveness Rubric calls these instructional strategies “Effective” or
“Highly Effective” instruction. By any
name, these are strategies that do not come with guarantees. When used well, however, the research—the
science—shows the chances of student learning is significantly increased.
For
example, we know from educational research the value of increasing student
engagement, how quality formative assessments result in achievement gains, and
that building background knowledge will improve student retention of new
concepts. We have seen the research on
meeting the needs of English Language Learners and how regular collaboration
results in improvement in both student achievement and teacher satisfaction.
The science
of teaching is about taking what we learn from the experts in the field, experimenting
with strategies, and adapting this learning to our school, our classes, and our
students. It calls for us to be constant
learners and experimenters.
On one
hand, we all should strive to be educational scientists.
The Art
If teaching
was all science, anyone could do it.
Teachers could plug a strategy into a lesson, follow the recipe, and
recreate the experiment using perfect scientific methodology. In fact, this seems to be the understanding
behind some of the latest initiatives, both state and national, to open the
field of teaching to all comers.
Those of us
who remember what it’s like to be a student and those of us who know what it is
like to teach probably have different perspectives on this concept. When dealing with people, especially young
people, controlling the variables is impossible. This is where teaching becomes an art.
The art of
teaching is about the literally thousands of decisions you make every day
inside and outside a classroom. It is
about knowing your students well enough to know which instructional strategy
will work in one class and not in another.
It is about how you read body language and adjust lessons on the fly. It is about knowing when to ask the right
question and about sequencing questions to push the students to the next
level. It is about knowing when to
scaffold and when to let students stand on their own. It is about intuition and creativity, nuance
and perception, perseverance and passion.
So on the
other hand, we should all strive to be educational artists.
The Journey
The fact
that teaching is an art and a science is not a new revelation to most of you,
but naming the twin aspects of good teaching might help provide another way to
think about what we do each day and about what is measured by the Teacher
Effectiveness Rubric. The reality is
that the better we get in both the art and in the science of teaching, the more
effective we will be at helping students learn at higher levels. This constant improvement is at the heart of
our journey at Hamilton Southeastern High School.
Take up the
beaker and Bunsen burner. Take up the
brush and clay. It’s a great week to be
an educational scientist, an educational artist, and a Royal.
Enjoy the
journey, HSE.
Phil