Email
Objective: By the end of this email, you will have a deeper understanding of
Competency 2.1 of the HSE Teacher Evaluation Rubric, as measured by your
responses.
When we moved to Fishers, we became increasingly
reliant on our GPS. In fact, I had to
get rid of my trusty Garmin because it wasn’t all that trusty. The maps were out of date. Of course, in Fishers I suppose maps go out
of date almost daily. Instead of
updating maps, I installed TeleNav on my phone.
I have a nifty holder on the dashboard, and I almost automatically put
the phone in the cradle and call up the maps.
At first I used TeleNav regularly to go
everywhere. Now that I know many new
locations, I tend to leave TeleNav in map mode to see where I am in the “big
picture” and to make connections between the areas I know and those gray areas
in between known locations.
The use of TeleNav is a fairly good metaphor for
Competency 2.1 in the Instruction Domain of the Teacher Effectiveness
Rubric. The actual document reads like
this: “Develop student understanding and
mastery of lesson objectives.”
This competency is all about communicating daily lesson objectives and measuring whether
or not students understand what they are learning each day in relationship to
where they came from and where they are going.
Emphasis should be placed on the word “daily.” Using the TeleNav metaphor, the final destination
is covered in Domain 1: Planning. Where
your students are on the road right now, and the next turn is covered in Domain
2(Instruction) and Competency 2.1.
So what the heck does 2.1 look like in the
classroom?
Below in italics
are the indicators of the “Effective (3)” category, with my commentary thrown
in for good measure. Indicators are what
their name implies. These are possible
ways to document evidence of effective teaching.
·
The lesson
objective is specific, measurable, and aligned to standards. It conveys what students are learning and
what they will be able to do by the end
of the lesson. Comments: Notice
that this indicator is about the purpose of each day’s lesson. The objective should not be a secret! The teacher can’t be the only one in the room
who knows what the daily objective is. The
teacher must “convey” to the students what they are to learn by the end of the
lesson. I like the phrasing, “By the end
of the lesson, students will….”
(BTEOTLSW… You can even use it in this abbreviated format on the board.) Notice also that the objective is different
than the standard. The daily objective
breaks the standard into lesson-sized chunks.
·
The
objective is written in a developmentally appropriate manner and/or explained
to students in easy-to-understand terms. Comments: Intuitive students are
likely to pick up the lesson’s objective without having it written or
explained. I contend that we have fewer
truly intuitive students than we think, and even they can benefit from scaffolding
to help clarify the daily objective.
·
The importance
of the objective is explained so that students understand why they are learning
what they are learning. Comments: I
could repeat the comments from the bullet directly above. Instead, I ask you to think of classes you
have taken. You do better and are more
focused when you understand “why” you are learning something. We need to make sure our students have this
benefit as well.
·
The lesson
builds on students’ prior knowledge of key concepts and skills and makes this
connection evident to students.
Comments: Start the academic GPS at the beginning of the lesson. You are essentially saying, “This is where we
have been. This is where we are
going. Today is going to help us make
the next step of the journey.” Check in
often during the lesson to make sure the students are on track.
·
The lesson
is well-organized to move students towards mastery of the objective. Comments: The lesson has to actually help
the students move down the road in the right direction. Self-evident perhaps, but it is possible to
take a scenic route to nowhere and waste time getting back on track. This indicator also calls for
assessment. How do you know the students
moved towards mastery? Daily assessments
can be formal or informal, but you need to gather formative feedback. More on this below.
Above are the indicators for the “Effective (3)”
rating. To get to “Highly Effective (4),”
much of the “Effective” evidence is observed throughout the year, plus:
·
Students
can explain what they are learning and why it is important, beyond repeating
the stated objective, and
·
The
teacher effectively engages prior knowledge of students in connecting to the
lesson. Students demonstrate through
work and comments that they understand this connection.
This is fairly easy to check. At the end of a lesson, give your students an
exit ticket and ask them what they learned (or learned at a deeper level) and
why it is important. See what they say. During class discussions, ask students to
connect what they are learning to past learning, to future learning, to other
courses in your content area, to content areas outside your department, and to
life. Avoid the temptation to make the
connections for them. Make them do the
thinking.
Side note: You will start to see a pattern in the
rubric. Effective indictors describe solid teaching, but they are often
more teacher-directed. To score 4 or Highly Effective, indicators have
students doing most of the thinking and work.
Student exit ticket responses and verbal answers,
whether they are what you hoped for or not, will inform your teaching for the
next day. You will make sure you are
navigating on the right road to get to your destination.
For Competency 2.1, turn on your academic
GPS. Fasten your seat belts. Check your review mirror, and merge into the
flow of traffic. Check your progress
often.
And don’t forget to enjoy the journey. Have a great week.
Phil
PS: Did I meet the objective for this email? What did you just learn—besides that guy
writes too much? Hit “Reply” and respond
to my exit ticket.
No comments:
Post a Comment