Our
Current Reality: The Frustrating Learning Cycle
“Just tell me what you want.”
Does that sound familiar with our
teacher evaluation process? When
learning something new, everyone cycles through a variety of stages. You are living this reality with TEDS and the
Teacher Effectiveness Rubric. You look
it over, think you understand it, and then become confused by one or more of
the indicators and start doubting your understanding. Eventually, something makes sense or you find
a “handle” to grab onto, and the cycle starts again.
No doubt you will feel better after
finishing a full year of TEDS. Hindsight
is often a more comfortable vantage point.
From there you will be able to see the big picture. In the meantime, eventually and inevitably,
you will go through times when you reach your limit, throw up your hands, and
say, “Just show me what you want.”
Our goal is to provide you with the
information you need and the tools you can use to complete this process, but we
are still in the learning cycle with you.
Together we will get this thing figured out, but the first time through
includes lots of new learning for all of us.
In the meantime, let’s acknowledge the
reality: It is part of human nature to become frustrated during the learning
process. The unknown is stressful, and
we don’t much like being beginners.
Spoiler Alert: In the coming weeks and
months, you may find yourself frustrated with Domains 1 and 3 and with the
Finalization Process.
For
Students: The Productive Struggle and Modeling
Since it is human nature to become
frustrated during the learning cycle, it is probably good to remember that
students are humans (of sort) as well.
They also become frustrated with the unknown in the learning
process. Most high school students don’t
like being beginners any more than we do.
Without question, there is a time for what has been called the “productive struggle.” (I really like this term and think it is
something we need to talk about. The
Common Core will force some of this discussion.)
Just as there is a time and place for
the productive struggle, there is also a time and place for clarification. This is where modeling comes in, especially
when dealing with difficult concepts, a thinking strategy, or with almost any
kind of writing. (A good way to think
about writing is this: Writing is thinking put down on paper.)
One of the only ways I know to teach
thinking skills is through modeling.
Effective Modeling is very
different than telling. Effective modeling takes careful planning and
includes a “think-aloud” so students can “hear” the thinking involved. The two steps to Effective Modeling are
listed below. In this example I am using
the teaching of a thinking strategy:
- Show
It: The first step is likely familiar to
all of you. It is looking at the
learning from the student’s perspective, breaking it down into parts, and
showing students the thinking strategy.
It is easy to forget what it is like to be a beginner, so thinking like
a student is essential as you show them the target strategy.
- The
Think-Aloud: The next step is to share the actual
thought process. This is metacognition
or thinking about the thinking. In this step, the teacher lets the students
“hear” the thinking going on with the use of the new strategy. It might start like this: “If I am a student
and I run into this kind of issue, I know I have to do some specialized
thinking. The conversation in my mind
would sound something like this….” From
here, the teacher uses first person, speaking from the student’s point of
view. The goal is to say out loud the
internal monologue, the thinking
going on inside the mind. The teacher
walks students through the important steps, the critical questions, and the
problem-solving techniques needed to be successful and learn the material. “First, I know I have to…. Since I know that…I ask myself….”
Modeling is the way to
teach higher order thinking skills to students, but there are many, many
variations. For example, exemplar papers
are actually models of thinking written down, students can be taught to model
effectively to each other, and you can find video clips of experts in your
field modeling their thinking to solve problems, complete tasks, or analyze
information. (Ted Talks and Kahn Academy
come to mind immediately as possible resources for effective modeling.)
Balancing
Act
In the coming weeks and months, we are
going to try as best we can to show you what is needed to complete the
TER. We will try to give you the tools
to help you through the process. The
difficulty is that we don’t have as much time together as we would like, and
more importantly, we are all beginners in this process. In other words, teachers and administrators
are learning TEDS together. We are
learning how to model right along
with you. I have no doubt we will figure
it all out, and this time next year will feel very different. We remain, however, in the “productive
struggle.”
While we continue to fight this good
fight with TEDS, take what you are experiencing as a learner and see if it has
application in your classrooms. Where is
productive struggle appropriate, and where can you provide both steps of the modeling process to help clarify the thinking
students need to successfully accomplish tasks and reach learning targets? Experiment with taking on the student’s
perspective and using a think-aloud to deepen student understanding. Teach students how our brains work and the
importance of metacognition. Teach them
how to think about their own thinking.
When students are given the “thinking”
tools, they will learn more and perform at higher levels.
Keep fighting the good fight, HSE. Continue the beautiful struggle.
Phil
From Kay Merseth, a senior fellow with
Carnegie working on a project named “Advancing Teaching”:
The
focus of productive struggle is on
the learning goals embedded in the problem or situation—it is not about
guessing what the teacher wants to hear or about finding a particular
answer. It is about the process of thinking, making sense, and persevering in the face
of not knowing exactly how to proceed or whether a particular approach will
work. Exploring, investigating
one or multiple approaches, and articulating
a chain of reasoning behind the approaches also characterizes productive
struggle.